Friday, 25 January 2013

Demystified: Does risk profiling complement Financial Planning?

Nowadays, lot of financial planners and investment advisors are going for risk profiling for their clients before giving them investment advice. Also, as per SEBI (Investment Advisers) Regulations, investment advisers are required to follow this exercise of Risk Profiling for their clients before recommending any investment.

Let us understand what is it.
What is Risk and Risk Profiling?
Risk means ‘chance of a loss’ or can be described at an act or a decision that may cause a loss. ‘Risk profiling’ is testing the willingness of a person to take risk. Asking the client few sets of “What if” kind of questions in different situations and scenarios; and also few questions on the client’s investment decisions are integral to risk profiling. Answer to these questions helps the planner to assess the risk taking capacity of the client and identify the risk profile of the client. There may be clients who can be completely risk averse while some can be risk seeker. For example, if the risk profile of a client is assessed as ‘conservative’, means that the client is not willing to take much risk and usually invests in fixed return investment instruments.

Willingness and Ability to take risk
Willingness to take risk differs from client to client and his/her attitude towards risk. Willingness to take risk can be assessed by risk profiling which helps the planner to understand how much risk the client can take or how conservative or aggressive is the client with respect to his investment decisions.

Ability to take risk is completely different from willingness to take risk. Ability of a client to take risk can be assessed from the client’s financial position / status, nature and time for the goal. A client can be risk seeker, but his financial condition and obligations may not allow him to take risk. So, in that case his investments should be conservative.

Risk Profiling and Financial Planning 
We all know financial plan is a road map for achieving the financial goals. The assets of the clients are allocated towards different goals and fresh investments are recommended for achieving these goals. Generally risk profiling is done for recommending the asset allocation of investments necessary for achieving the financial goals. But, is risk profiling really helpful?

Lets take an example, if a planner has assessed the risk profile of a young client to be conservative (i.e. risk averse) and wants to plan for his child’s higher education after 15 years and the inflation adjusted corpus comes to Rs.30 lakhs. He has a very tight cash flow due to his existing home loan and has monthly surplus of Rs.5,000. So, considering his risk profile he should be recommended investment of 80% debt and 20% in Equity. Assuming weighted average return of 9.40% p.a. from such investment, he should invest Rs.7,650 per month to accumulate the desired corpus. While the same corpus may be achieved by investing 90% in equity via Mutual Fund SIP and 10% in Debt instrument since the time horizon is 15 years he can take risk. Assuming weighted average return of 14.30% p.a. from such investment, he should invest Rs.4,800 per month. So, how will he accumulate the desired corpus if he invests as per the risk profile? How will he meet the shortfall in his required monthly investment amount? He may have to compromise on his son’s education in future since there will be shortfall. The returns may not be guaranteed in either of the strategies; also there is a certain amount of risk too attached to the latter investment strategy and requires periodical review. But the risk taken would provide additional rewards and may help him achieve the corpus.
 
So, I don’t think risk-profiling complements the financial planning exercise. In cases where there are multiple financial goals, it can be very difficult to achieve all the financial goals. Also, investment in risky assets cannot be recommended for short-term goals even if the client’s risk profile is aggressive. Thus, risk profiling and financial planning doesn’t seem to go hand-in-hand. But yes, it can be a support mechanism, which will enable the professional planner to understand his client in a better light.

But recommendations can certainly be not based just on client’s risk profile as it may have certain restricting factors with respect to his age, income and time horizon of his goals. Whereas it is paramount that financial planner / investment adviser takes all these aspects into account before basing his recommendations.